Jonathan Lewis wrote:Yes, I can well understand the attraction/temptation - 1960s Italian styling coupled with one of the finest (IMHO) big-block V8s ever made. Calculating the likely fuel costs forces an acknowledgement of reality, however...
Still can't get to like that goldfish-bowl rear hatch, however...
Regards,
The rear hatch gives a typical 60s/70s view of the road behind (unhindered) and superb all round vision for reversing and parking, I love it. Something which modern car designers seem increasingly less worried about.
Fuel costs for running the mkIII were not as bad as I feared they would be and the earlier non A/C equipped 6.3 (383ci) would be marginally better and is more powerful. A more modern carb to replace the Carter and a modern transmission with torque convertor lockup might squeeze more from the gallon. I got around 14-15mpg over 200miles and I did occassionally (

) use the throttle to the full.
At one point we were heading to a family get together and used a motorway to get there. Amanda said to me 'we seem to have left the other cars behind, what speed are we doing?', to which I replied 'only just over 80', I then realised the satnav was showing 95, the speedo was a little out but the car was totally relaxed at the speed and that was partly why the 'just over 80' seemed correct.
Colin.
Sorry for the thread drift Lee
