Propshaft fitting
Come to swap my propshaft with a spare one from a donor car, but 1 is fitted with the sliding joint at the gearbox end, the other with it at the diff end?
Which is correct?
Thanks.
Mike.
Which is correct?
Thanks.
Mike.
Re: Propshaft fitting
If you do a search you'll find a fairly recent thread on this subject.
I always put mine back in the same orientation with the help of Tippex.
Kev
Re: Propshaft fitting
Sliding joint at the rear.
Charles Harrison
Register member 3095
Folkestone
Cherry Red Mk1 2000 Rally Car
Mallard Blue 2.5PI
Sapphire Blue GT6 Mk3
Vermillion Red Spitfire 1500
Pimento Red TR6
Inky Blue VW Passat B5.5
Arctic Blue Jaguar XJ40
Silver Range Rover Vogue SE
Register member 3095
Folkestone
Cherry Red Mk1 2000 Rally Car
Mallard Blue 2.5PI
Sapphire Blue GT6 Mk3
Vermillion Red Spitfire 1500
Pimento Red TR6
Inky Blue VW Passat B5.5
Arctic Blue Jaguar XJ40
Silver Range Rover Vogue SE
-
- Senior Member
- Posts:944
- Joined:Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:50 pm
- Location:United Kingdom
Re: Propshaft fitting
There is frequent debate in the Series LandRover Club about this, and the concensus is that each joint should be at the gearbox end,
a) because they are higher off the ground so get less road dirt splash
b) because it's heavier than the plain tube so it reduces unsprung weight
I don't think either argument signifies in the case of the Triumph - the shaft is quite low at both ends, and the IRS means none of its weight is unsprung.
A conclusive argument I found was that the shaft is thinner at the sliding joint so easier to keep clear of the handbrake cable horseshoe if mounted at the axle end. (another argument for an exhaust without the middle silencers)
a) because they are higher off the ground so get less road dirt splash
b) because it's heavier than the plain tube so it reduces unsprung weight
I don't think either argument signifies in the case of the Triumph - the shaft is quite low at both ends, and the IRS means none of its weight is unsprung.
A conclusive argument I found was that the shaft is thinner at the sliding joint so easier to keep clear of the handbrake cable horseshoe if mounted at the axle end. (another argument for an exhaust without the middle silencers)
Re: Propshaft fitting
But then again, an auto has the sliding joint at the gearbox end.....
Register Member no. 1596
1967 Mk1 2000 in Gunmetal Grey
1969 Mk1 2000 in Royal Blue
1970 Mk2 2000 in Valencia Blue
1972 Mk2 2.5 PI in Triumph White
1973 Mk2 2.5 PI in Sienna Brown
1976 Mk2 2500S in Carmine Red
1967 Mk1 2000 in Gunmetal Grey
1969 Mk1 2000 in Royal Blue
1970 Mk2 2000 in Valencia Blue
1972 Mk2 2.5 PI in Triumph White
1973 Mk2 2.5 PI in Sienna Brown
1976 Mk2 2500S in Carmine Red
Re: Propshaft fitting
FWIW. If you were to have the short yoke attached to the gearbox, and then drive it (without the prop fitted), it would fly outwards, and hit whatever with the force at the end of about 6". If you did the same with the propshaft, it would hit with the force at the end of about 4 foot (the length of the prop). That is trying to happen when the two halves of the prop are joined together, it's just the splined slider stopping it, and so that will wear the splines, and more so if the sliding joint is at the rear. Discuss.
Currently over 35 years worth of fixing 35 boxes.
Hoping to reach 65 years worth of fixing 65 boxes.
Hoping to reach 65 years worth of fixing 65 boxes.
Re: Propshaft fitting
Hello Harry,
sorry but I can't see your argument. The point is that the shaft as a whole is connected and restrained by the connection at both ends. Because of that there is no centrifugal force to throw the shaft outwards.
My Triumph parts book RTC9112 shows the sliding joint at the gearbox end.
Alec
sorry but I can't see your argument. The point is that the shaft as a whole is connected and restrained by the connection at both ends. Because of that there is no centrifugal force to throw the shaft outwards.
My Triumph parts book RTC9112 shows the sliding joint at the gearbox end.
Alec
0465
MK1.5 2.5 P.I.
Jaguar MK 2 (Long term restoration.)
Hymer 564 Motorhome.
MK1.5 2.5 P.I.
Jaguar MK 2 (Long term restoration.)
Hymer 564 Motorhome.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts:944
- Joined:Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:50 pm
- Location:United Kingdom
Re: Propshaft fitting
The "pole vaulting" argument has featured on other car forums, and the conclusions seem to be pretty catastrophic at either end.
Four feet of propshaft flailing around is going to do a lot of damage anywhere, but perhaps would bring a speedy end sooner at the front (by stopping the engine) but might be much more serious at the rear.
However, seriously, how likely is it that the prop shaft will ever come apart like that?
I don't think wear on the sliding joint is caused by centrifugal force. I would guess it comes from simple sliding in and out as the suspension rises and falls, exacerbated by transmitting torque at the same time.
Four feet of propshaft flailing around is going to do a lot of damage anywhere, but perhaps would bring a speedy end sooner at the front (by stopping the engine) but might be much more serious at the rear.
However, seriously, how likely is it that the prop shaft will ever come apart like that?
I don't think wear on the sliding joint is caused by centrifugal force. I would guess it comes from simple sliding in and out as the suspension rises and falls, exacerbated by transmitting torque at the same time.
Re: Propshaft fitting
Hello Clif,
you would have to endure a vibrating noisy car if the flange bolts were loosening. In reality it is very unlikely to happen.
Alec
you would have to endure a vibrating noisy car if the flange bolts were loosening. In reality it is very unlikely to happen.
Alec
0465
MK1.5 2.5 P.I.
Jaguar MK 2 (Long term restoration.)
Hymer 564 Motorhome.
MK1.5 2.5 P.I.
Jaguar MK 2 (Long term restoration.)
Hymer 564 Motorhome.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests