It is currently Thu Aug 17, 2017 7:05 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 9:23 am 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:27 pm
Posts: 466
Location: Winchester
Hi all,

Seeing that MkII rear drums are no longer available, what's involved in converting to the Stag setup?

If not wise, then has anyone got a pair of MkII drums stashed away that they no longer need?

Thanks :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:24 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:52 pm
Posts: 195
JimB wrote:
Hi all,

Seeing that MkII rear drums are no longer available, what's involved in converting to the Stag setup?

If not wise, then has anyone got a pair of MkII drums stashed away that they no longer need?

Thanks :D


There has been a very recent thread on converting to the Stag set-up. Do a search on rear brakes or something like that.

Kev


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:46 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 9:50 pm
Posts: 3343
Location: South Oxfordshire, UK
What's wrong with your old drums Jim? If they are not badly oval or worn they should be fine. If not, I'm sure I can find a pair!

I've not forgotten your need for a clutch bearing carrier, I've just not had time to look yet...

Personally, I'd be a bit careful about changing the drums to Stag setup without also changing the discs etc. You might upset the front/rear brake balance.

Cheers,
Mike.

_________________
(South Oxfordshire)
Register Member No 0355
1967 Herald 1200 Convertible rust should be white
1971 2.5PI Saloon Sapphire blue
1973 2.5PI Saloon rust some Honeysuckle
1973 Stag French blue
(1949 LandRover was blue should be light green!)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Huh
PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:17 am 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:27 pm
Posts: 113
Location: Caithness, Scotland
JimB wrote:
Seeing that MkII rear drums are no longer available

:?:
http://www.chriswitor.com/proddetail.php?prod=210578A
http://www.chriswitor.com/proddetail.php?prod=216461SH

_________________
Ian,
owner of a Dolomite (1850) now after having run a 2500S (for 4 years), a Dolomite 1500HL (for a few months),
a Dolomite Sprint (for 10 years) and a second 2500S (for 5 years until 2007).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 5:02 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:52 pm
Posts: 195
Mike Stevens wrote:
What's wrong with your old drums Jim? If they are not badly oval or worn they should be fine. If not, I'm sure I can find a pair!

I've not forgotten your need for a clutch bearing carrier, I've just not had time to look yet...

Personally, I'd be a bit careful about changing the drums to Stag setup without also changing the discs etc. You might upset the front/rear brake balance.

Cheers,
Mike.

I just did the rear drums on mine Mike as I don't think the discs are radically different.

Kev


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 11:54 am 
Offline
Groupie
Groupie

Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:50 pm
Posts: 76
Location: Luton
canley classic stock new
216461 BRAKE DRUM - 2000 2.5 MKII £28.00 EACH IN STOCK



Pete

_________________
Pete Lewis
Luton
also area organiser for herts and beds tssc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 9:50 pm
Posts: 3343
Location: South Oxfordshire, UK
torque2me wrote:
I just did the rear drums on mine Mike as I don't think the discs are radically different.

Stag discs are bigger in diameter (which is why 13" wheels won't fit onto them) and there are others who have fitted Stag brakes so I guess the braking force could well be more than a standard 2000 setup. Not that there is anything wrong with the 2000 setup!

I just wanted to air the view that fitting Stag rear brakes but keeping standard 2000 fronts might cause a brake imbalance. Note that I have not done it so am not speaking from experience! :lol:

Cheers,
Mike.

_________________
(South Oxfordshire)
Register Member No 0355
1967 Herald 1200 Convertible rust should be white
1971 2.5PI Saloon Sapphire blue
1973 2.5PI Saloon rust some Honeysuckle
1973 Stag French blue
(1949 LandRover was blue should be light green!)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:22 pm 
Offline
Groupie
Groupie

Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:50 pm
Posts: 76
Location: Luton
With 14"wheels I found stag fronts were well cheaper than 2000 mk2
so she has stag disc and calipers but std rears apart from the stag hand brake shoe spreader

_________________
Pete Lewis
Luton
also area organiser for herts and beds tssc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 7:49 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:52 pm
Posts: 195
Mike Stevens wrote:
torque2me wrote:
I just did the rear drums on mine Mike as I don't think the discs are radically different.

Stag discs are bigger in diameter (which is why 13" wheels won't fit onto them) and there are others who have fitted Stag brakes so I guess the braking force could well be more than a standard 2000 setup. Not that there is anything wrong with the 2000 setup!

I just wanted to air the view that fitting Stag rear brakes but keeping standard 2000 fronts might cause a brake imbalance. Note that I have not done it so am not speaking from experience! :lol:

Cheers,
Mike.


I was just letting the groupies know that changing to Stag drums has not created any great imbalance on mine. Pete, doing it the other way is also interesting.

It years since I could reel off part numbers and the differences but if the front discs are different size wise then it is (warning, warning - guesstimate) probably 1/4" (9.75" against 9.5"?). As GBP242 is the only pads available now and these were spec for the 2.5 I would guess there is little to be gained from using the Stag disc. After all, it cannot grip a larger area and on my 2.2 mk.2 there is about 1/8"th top of the disc unsweapt.

CW did a comparison test of various combinations in Six Appeal some years back. I think he gave a small percentage gain for Stag disc/(drum?) setup. As I say, I'm unconvinced with a 242 pad usage.

Kev


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group