Re: \"thou\" and \"mil\", my experience is exactly as Alec\'s but maybe there\'s a difference between mechanical and electrical/electronic engineering \'speak\'. A rather dangerous difference though!
One thing I like about the railway preservation scene is that it\'s almost all imperial. Hard to envisage a 34.925 mm Whitworth bolt in place of a 1.3/8\"!
There are some oddities though. The bolts and nuts on the Danish loco that I\'m working on are hybrids having Whitworth threads but Unified Heavy Series hexagons. Note: For any other sad anoraks like me, that\'s BS 84 threads and BS 1769 heads! <IMG> <IMG>
It\'s not only steam locos that have funny fasteners. Some Fords of the 1960s/70s had a mix of imperial, metric and imp/metric hybrids - all on the same car! Thankfully our Triumphs have only Unified Normal Series (BS 1768!) - so far as I know.
Tune in next week for another episode of this captivating drama!<edited><editID>Dizzy</editID><editDate>39372.8389467593</editDate></edited>
Rocker assembly
- David Withers
- Senior Member
- Posts:1230
- Joined:Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:28 am
- Location:North Cambridgeshire, UK
- Contact:
Hello Dizzy, <br><br>reference threads and heads, Morris bought a French engine manufacturer but when he used the engines in his cars he retained the metric threads but used Whitworth hexagons!<br><br>REY808k, not in Colwyn Bay by any chance? (Noting the Welsh registration number, I once had a Wolseley 1500, DEY 888 which was once owned by the Anglesey MP, Cledwyn Hughes)<br>
-
- Site Admin
- Posts:3593
- Joined:Mon May 08, 2006 9:50 pm
- Location:South Oxfordshire, UK
Hi All,
Maybe it\'s me then. Certainly to me, \"thou\" is 0.001\" and so is \"mil\". I guess \'cos we have some American ancestry here at work maybe that\'s where it comes from. It\'s when they say \"3.5 mil\", is when I say \"do you mean 3.5mm or 3.5 thou\". It\'s always the former. The dictionary lists \'mil\' as 1/1000 inch...
As well as the Triumphs, My everyday car is a Jaguar (sorry!) which is in the main Metric and I also have an early series I LandRover which is \"Whitworth\", by which I suppose I really mean BSF? Over the years I have certainly accumulated a number of spanners which are labelled x/xW, (for example). I am also lucky to have acquired a complete set of Warrior BSF taps and dies. Lucky chap...
Time to move on....!
Cheers, Mike
Maybe it\'s me then. Certainly to me, \"thou\" is 0.001\" and so is \"mil\". I guess \'cos we have some American ancestry here at work maybe that\'s where it comes from. It\'s when they say \"3.5 mil\", is when I say \"do you mean 3.5mm or 3.5 thou\". It\'s always the former. The dictionary lists \'mil\' as 1/1000 inch...
As well as the Triumphs, My everyday car is a Jaguar (sorry!) which is in the main Metric and I also have an early series I LandRover which is \"Whitworth\", by which I suppose I really mean BSF? Over the years I have certainly accumulated a number of spanners which are labelled x/xW, (for example). I am also lucky to have acquired a complete set of Warrior BSF taps and dies. Lucky chap...
Time to move on....!
Cheers, Mike
-
- Senior Member
- Posts:944
- Joined:Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:50 pm
- Location:United Kingdom
What I like is working on a car that has had all its nuts and bolts randomly replaced out of someone\'s odds and ends box, so has a mixture of threads and flat sizes. There\'s nothing quite like lying under the car trying to match up bell housing bolts, alternately trying to reach for one of half a dozen similar but different spanners. Or finding with the nut half on that the thread isn\'t quite the same.
- David Withers
- Senior Member
- Posts:1230
- Joined:Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:28 am
- Location:North Cambridgeshire, UK
- Contact:
A Google search brings up lots of references of \"mil\" as .001\". Seems it\'s an abbreviation of milliinch! How absurd, applying a metric term to an imperial measurement!
It does seem mostly American but it appears some misguided Brits use it as well, e.g. see <A>http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A471476</A>
I\'ve been working with \'thous\' almost daily since 1959 or earlier. Never before heard them referred to as \"mil\". It\'s about as desirable as that other \"mil\", my mother-in-law!
Good description of mixed threads and hexagons, Cliff. I expect we\'ve all come across this at some time. The very worst examples are UNC fasteners screwed into Whitworth tappings, made possible because all sizes other than 1/2\" have the same TPI! The different thread angle (Whit 55 degrees and UNC 60 degrees) means that the threads are engaging crest-to-root instead of flank-to-flank, a sure recipe for loosening in service! Doesn\'t affect cars much as they rarely used Whit (they used BSF which has a different TPI to UNF), but it\'s something to be watched for on steam railway locomotives.
It does seem mostly American but it appears some misguided Brits use it as well, e.g. see <A>http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A471476</A>
I\'ve been working with \'thous\' almost daily since 1959 or earlier. Never before heard them referred to as \"mil\". It\'s about as desirable as that other \"mil\", my mother-in-law!
Good description of mixed threads and hexagons, Cliff. I expect we\'ve all come across this at some time. The very worst examples are UNC fasteners screwed into Whitworth tappings, made possible because all sizes other than 1/2\" have the same TPI! The different thread angle (Whit 55 degrees and UNC 60 degrees) means that the threads are engaging crest-to-root instead of flank-to-flank, a sure recipe for loosening in service! Doesn\'t affect cars much as they rarely used Whit (they used BSF which has a different TPI to UNF), but it\'s something to be watched for on steam railway locomotives.
- David Withers
- Senior Member
- Posts:1230
- Joined:Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:28 am
- Location:North Cambridgeshire, UK
- Contact:
Mike, you mentioned that your Land Rover has Whitworth, \"by which I suppose I really mean BSF?\" you say. Both have threads of Whitworth form so, yes, they are Whitworth whether BSW or BSF!
No need to be embarrassed about having a Jaguar. As my signature shows, I have a Rover 75 with a BMW engine and I\'m happy for anyone to know!
Last I heard, both Jaguar and Land Rover looked set to become part of the Indian firm of Tata. MG-Rover has gone down the spout of course, but better to die gracefully than sell out to a phut-phut wheelie-bin maker! <IMG><edited><editID>Dizzy</editID><editDate>39373.7536226852</editDate></edited>
No need to be embarrassed about having a Jaguar. As my signature shows, I have a Rover 75 with a BMW engine and I\'m happy for anyone to know!
Last I heard, both Jaguar and Land Rover looked set to become part of the Indian firm of Tata. MG-Rover has gone down the spout of course, but better to die gracefully than sell out to a phut-phut wheelie-bin maker! <IMG><edited><editID>Dizzy</editID><editDate>39373.7536226852</editDate></edited>
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests